Critical accounting judgements 

Critical accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty

This section describes the critical judgements that the Group has made in the process of applying the accounting policies.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union (EU). The accounting policies applied by the group also comply with IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). This means that we are required to make estimates and assumptions. We believe that, of the company's significant accounting policies (see Note 2 - Significant accounting policies to our Consolidated financial statements included in this report), the following may involve a greater degree of judgement and complexity, which in turn could materially affect the net income if various assumptions were changed significantly.

Critical judgements in applying accounting policies

The following are the critical judgements, apart from those involving estimations (see below), that the Group has made in the process of applying the accounting policies and that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements:

Revenue recognition - gross versus net presentation of traded SDFI volumes of oil and gas production

As described under Transactions with the Norwegian State (see Note 2 - Significant accounting policies to our Consolidated financial statements included in this report), the Group markets and sells the Norwegian State's share of oil and gas production from the NCS. The Group includes the costs of purchase and proceeds from the sale of the SDFI oil production in its Cost of goods sold and Revenue, respectively. In making the judgement the Group considered the detailed criteria for the recognition of revenue from the sale of goods set out in IAS 18 Revenue, and assessed in particular by analogy whether the risk and reward of the ownership of the goods had been transferred from the SDFI to the Group.

As also described in Note 2 to our Consolidated financial statements, the Group sells, in its own name, but for the Norwegian State's account and risk, the State's production of natural gas. This sale and related expenditures refunded by the State are recorded net in the Group's financial statements. In making the judgement the Group considered the same criteria as for the oil production and concluded that the risk and reward of the ownership of the gas had not been transferred from the SDFI to the Group.

Method of accounting applied to the Hydro merger

As described under Basis of preparation (see Note 2 - Significant accounting policies to our Consolidated financial statements included in this report), the merger between former Statoil and Hydro's oil and energy business has been accounted for using the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities. When making this judgement the Group considered firstly whether the former Statoil and Hydro were under the common control of the Norwegian State, and secondly, given the conclusion that both entities were under the control of the Norwegian State, assessed what method of accounting would provide the most meaningful portrayal of the merger for accounting purposes. StatoilHydro concluded that such a reorganisation would be best presented using the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities, and restating all financial statements for all periods presented as if the companies had always been combined.

Key sources of estimation uncertainty

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires that management make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the result of which form the basis of making the judgements about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis taking the current and expected future market conditions into consideration.

The group is exposed to a number of underlying economic factors, such as liquids prices, natural gas prices, refining margins, foreign exchange rates, as well as financial instruments with fair values derived from changes in these factors, which affect the overall results. In addition, the results of the group are influenced by the level of production, which in the short term may be influenced by for instance maintenance. In the long term, the results are affected by the success of exploration and field development activities.

The matters described below are considered to be the most important in understanding the key sources of estimation uncertainty that are involved in preparing these financial statements and the uncertainties that could most significantly impact the amounts reported on the results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

Proved oil and gas reserves. Proved oil and gas reserves have been estimated by internal experts in accordance with industry standards and based on criteria established by regulations of the SEC. Reserves estimates are based on subjective judgments involving geological and engineering assessments of in-place hydrocarbon volumes, the production, historical extraction recovery and processing yield factors, installed plant operating capacity and operating approval limits. The reliability of these estimates at any point in time depends on both the quality and quantity of the technical and economic data and the efficiency of extracting and processing the hydrocarbons. An independent third party has evaluated StatoilHydro's proved reserves estimates, and the results of such evaluation do not differ materially from management estimates. Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of the date the estimate is made. Prices include consideration of changes in existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements but not escalations based upon future conditions. Future changes in proved oil and gas reserves, for instance as a result of changes in prices, could have a material impact on unit of production rates used for depreciation and amortisation.

Expected oil and gas reserves. Expected oil and gas reserves have been estimated by internal experts in accordance with industry standards and are used for impairment testing purposes and for calculation of asset retirement obligations. Reserves estimates are based on subjective judgments involving geological and engineering assessments of in-place hydrocarbons volumes, the production, historical extraction recovery and processing yield factors, installed plant operating capacity and operating approval limits. The reliability of these estimates at any point in time depends on both the quality and quantity of the technical and economic data and the efficiency of extracting and processing the hydrocarbons. Future changes in expected oil and gas reserves, for instance as a result of changes in prices, could have a material impact on asset retirement obligations, as well as on the impairment testing of upstream assets, which could have a material adverse effect on operating income as a result of increased impairment charges.

Exploration and leasehold acquisition costs. The Group's accounting policy is to capitalise the costs of drilling exploratory wells pending determination of whether the wells have found proved oil and gas reserves. The Group also capitalises leasehold acquisition costs and signature bonuses paid to obtain access to undeveloped oil and gas acreage. Judgements on whether these expenditures should remain capitalised or written down due to impairment losses in the period may materially affect the operating income for the period.

Impairment/reversal of impairment. The Group has significant investments in property, plant and equipment and intangibles. Changes in the circumstances or expectations of future performance of an individual asset may be an indicator that the asset is impaired requiring the book value to be written down to its recoverable amount. Impairments are reversed if the conditions for impairment are no longer present. Evaluating whether an asset is impaired or if an impairment should be reversed requires a high degree of judgement and may depend to a large extent on the selection of key assumptions about the future.

Unproved oil and gas properties are assessed for impairment on a quarterly basis or when facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount of the asset may exceed its recoverable amount. If, following evaluation, an exploratory well has not found proved reserves, the previously capitalised costs are tested for impairment. Exploratory wells that have found reserves, but where classification of those reserves as proved depends on whether a major capital expenditure can be justified, may remain capitalised for more than one year. The main conditions are that firm plans exist for future drilling in the licence, or that a development decision is planned in the near future.

Estimating the recoverable amount involves complexity in estimating relevant future cash flows based on future assumptions which are discounted to their present value.

Impairment testing requires long-term assumptions to be made concerning a number of often volatile economic factors such as future market prices, currency exchange rates and future output, discount rates and political and country risk among others, in order to establish relevant future cash flows. Long-term assumptions for major factors are made at group level, and there is a high degree of reasoned judgement involved in establishing these assumptions, in determining other relevant factors such as forward price curves, in estimating production outputs, and in determining the ultimate termination value of an asset.

Employee retirement plans. When estimating the present value of defined pension benefit obligations that represent a gross long-term liability in the consolidated balance sheet, and indirectly, the period's net pension expense in the consolidated statement of income, management make a number of critical assumptions affecting these estimates. Most notably, assumptions made on the discount rate to be applied to future benefit payments, the expected return on plan assets and the annual rate of compensation increase have a direct and material impact on the amounts presented. Significant changes in these assumptions between periods can have a material effect on the accounts.

Asset retirement obligations. The Group has significant obligations to decommission and remove offshore installations at the end of the production period. Legal obligations associated with the retirement of non-current assets are recognised at their fair value at the time the obligations are incurred. Upon initial recognition of a liability, the cost is capitalised as part of the related non-current asset and allocated to expense over the useful life of the asset.

It is difficult to estimate the costs of these decommissioning and removal activities, which are based on current regulations and technology, considering relevant risks and uncertainties. Most of the removal activities are many years into the future and the removal technology and costs are constantly changing. The estimates include assumptions about the time required and the day rates for rigs, marine operations and heavy lift vessels that can vary considerably depending on the assumed removal complexity. As a result, the initial recognition of the liability and the capitalised cost associated with decommissioning and removal obligations, and the subsequent adjustment of these balance sheet items, involve the application of significant judgement.

Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities. The Group recognises all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in fair value of derivatives are included in the statement of income. Loans subject to fair value hedge accounting are adjusted for the fair value impact of the hedged risk. This adjustment will offset the majority of the change in fair value of the corresponding derivative.

When not directly observable in active markets, the fair value of derivative contracts must be computed internally based on internal assumptions as well as directly observable market information, including forward and yield curves for commodities, currencies and interest. Changes in internal assumptions and forward curves could materially impact the internally computed fair value of derivative contracts, particularly long-term contracts, resulting in a corresponding impact on income or loss in the income statement.

Income tax. The Group annually incurs significant amounts of income taxes payable to various jurisdictions around the world, and it also recognises significant changes in deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities, all of which are based on management's interpretations of applicable laws, regulations and relevant court decisions. The quality of these estimates is highly dependent upon management's ability to properly apply what can be very complex sets of rules, to recognise changes in applicable rules and, in the case of deferred tax assets, management's ability to project future earnings from activities that may apply loss carry forward positions against future income taxes.

Terms and conditions Privacy policy About this site Feedback Sitemap Contact

© Statoil 2009