| 1 |
Strategy and Analysis |
| 1.1 |
Statement from the most senior decision-maker about the relevance of sustainability to the organisation and its strategy |
CEO letter
|
Full |
|
| 1.2 |
Description of key impacts, risks and opportunities. The reporting organisation should provide two concise narrative sections on key impacts, risks and opportunities |
CEO letter,
Our corporate strategy,
Health and safety,
Climate and environment,
People and the group,
Society,
Risks related to our business
|
Full |
|
| 2 |
Organisational profile |
| 2.1 |
Name of organisation |
Statoil ASA |
Full |
|
| 2.2 |
Primary brands, products, and/or services |
About Statoil,
Operational review,
Midstream and downstream products
|
Full |
|
| 2.3 |
Operational structure of the organisation, including main division, operating companies, subsidiaries and joint ventures |
Operational review |
Full |
|
| 2.4 |
Location of organisation's headquarters |
About Statoil,
Our business
|
Full |
|
| 2.5 |
Number of countries where the organisation operates, and names of countries with either major operations or that are specifically relevant to the sustainability issues covered in the report |
About Statoil,
Our business,
Operational review
|
Full |
|
| 2.6 |
Nature of ownership and legal form |
About Statoil,
Our business,
The boundaries of our reporting
|
Full |
|
| 2.7 |
Markets served (including geographic breakdown, sectors served, and types of customers/beneficiaries) |
Our business,
Operational review
|
Full |
|
| 2.8 |
Scale of the reporting organisation |
About Statoil,
Key figures,
Our business,
The boundaries of our reporting
|
Full |
|
| 2.9 |
Significant changes during the reporting period regarding size, structure or ownership |
A glance at 2011,
Board of directors report
|
Full |
|
| 2.10 |
Awards received in the reporting period |
The context of our reporting
|
Full |
Statoil was the most highly ranked oil company on Fortune magazine's list of the world's most admired companies, not least due to our standing on innovation and social responsibility (where we ranked number one regardless of industry). Canadian media company Corporate Knights also publishes a "Global 100" sustainability list, in which Statoil is ranked number one of all energy companies, and number three regardless of industry
|
| 3 |
Report parameters |
|
Report profile |
| 3.1 |
Reporting period (fiscal/calendar year) for information provided |
Defining the content of our reporting
|
Full |
|
| 3.2 |
Date of most recent previous report |
2010 Annual and sustainability report
|
Full |
|
| 3.3 |
Reporting cycle (annual, biennial, etc) |
Annual |
Full |
|
| 3.4 |
Contact point for questions regarding the report or it contents |
Hilde Røed
|
Full |
Feedback is much appreciated |
|
Report scope and boundary |
| 3.5 |
Process for defining report content |
About the report,
Defining the content of our reporting,
The context of our reporting,
The boundaries of our reporting
|
Full |
|
| 3.6 |
Boundary of the report (countries, divisions, subsidiaries, leased facilities, joint ventures, suppliers). See GRI boundary protocol for further guidance |
Defining the content of our reporting,
The boundaries of our reporting
|
Full |
|
| 3.7 |
State any specific limitations on the scope or boundary of the report |
Defining the content of our reporting,
The boundaries of our reporting
|
Full |
|
| 3.8 |
Basis for reporting on joint ventures, subsidiaries, leased facilities, outsourced operations and other entities that can significantly affect comparability from period to period and/or between organisations |
Defining the content of our reporting,
The boundaries of our reporting
|
Full |
|
| 3.9 |
Data measurement techniques and the bases of calculations, including assumptions and techniques underlying estimations applied to the compilation of the indicators and other information in the report |
Economic impact per country,
HSE performance indicators,
Environmental posters,
Social performance data
|
Full |
|
| 3.10 |
Explanation of the effect of any restatements of information provided in earlier reports, and the reasons for such restatement (mergers/acquisitions, change of base years/periods, nature of business, measurement methods, etc) |
|
Full |
There has not been any restatements compared to previous reports |
| 3.11 |
Significant changes from previous reporting periods in the scope, boundary, or measurement methods applied in the report |
The boundaries of our reporting |
Full |
In 2011, information on Statoil Fuel & Retail is reported separately, unless otherwise stated |
|
GRI content index |
| 3.12 |
Table identifying the location of the standard disclosures in the report |
Cross reference to GRI index
|
Full |
|
| 3.13 |
Policy and current practice with regard to seeking external assurance for the report. If not included in the assurance report accompanying the sustainability report, explain the scope and basis of any external assurance provided. Also explain the relationship between the reporting organisation and the assurance provider(s) |
About the report,
The context of our reporting,
Assurance report from Ernst & Young
|
Full |
|
| 4 |
Governance, commitments, engagements |
| 4.1 |
Governance structure of the organization, including committees under the highest governance body responsible for specific tasks, such as setting strategy or organisational oversight |
Governance,
Corporate governance,
General meeting of shareholders,
Nomination committee,
Corporate assembly and board
|
Full |
|
| 4.2 |
Indicate whether the chair of the highest governance body is also an executive officer (and, if so, their function within the organisation’s management and the reasons for this arrangement) |
Board of directors
|
Full |
|
| 4.3 |
For organisations that have a unitary board structure, state the number of members of the highest governance body that are independent and/or non-executive members |
Social performance data
Board of directors
|
Full |
|
| 4.4 |
Mechanisms for shareholders and employees to provide recommendations or direction to the highest governance body |
Employee & industrial relations,
General meeting of shareholders,
Board of directors
|
Full |
Three directors on the board are chosen from among employees |
| 4.5 |
Linkage between compensation for members of the highest governance body, senior managers, and executives (including departure arrangements), and the organisation’s performance (including social and environmental performance) |
Compensation committee,
Compensation paid to governing bodies
Board remuneration,
Note 8
|
Full |
|
| 4.6 |
Processes in place for the highest governance body to ensure conflicts of interest are avoided |
Ethics Code of Conduct,
Equal treatment
|
Full |
|
| 4.7 |
Process for determining the qualifications and expertise of the members of the highest governance body for guiding the organisation’s strategy on economic, environmental, and social topics |
Governance,
Board remuneration
|
Full |
|
| 4.8 |
Internally developed statements of mission or values, codes of conduct, and principles relevant to economic, environmental, and social performance and the status of their implementation |
Ethics and values,
The context of our reporting,
Performance management,
Ethics Code of Conduct
|
Full |
|
| 4.9 |
Procedures of the highest governance body for overseeing the organisation’s identification and management of economic, environmental, and social performance, including relevant risks and opportunities, and adherence or compliance with internationally agreed standards, codes of conduct, and principles |
Governance,
HSE and ethics committee,
The work of the board of directors,
Risk management and control
|
Full |
|
| 4.10 |
Processes for evaluating the highest governance body’s own performance, particularly with respect to economic, environmental, and social performance |
Governance,
The work of the board of directors
|
Full |
|
|
Commitments to external initiatives |
| 4.11 |
Explanation of whether and how the precautionary approach or principle is addressed by the organisation |
Risk management and sustainability,
Integrated impact assessments
|
Full |
|
| 4.12 |
Externally developed economic, environmental, and social charters, principles, or other initiatives to which the organisation subscribes or endorses |
Stakeholder engagement,
Working in collaboration
|
Full |
|
| 4.13 |
Memberships in associations (such as industry associations) and/or national/international advocacy organisations |
Stakeholder engagement,
Working in collaboration
|
Full |
|
|
Stakeholder engagement |
| 4.14 |
List of stakeholder groups engaged by the organisation |
Stakeholder engagement,
Working in collaboration
|
Full |
|
| 4.15 |
Basis for identification and selection of stakeholders with whom to engage |
Defining the content of our reporting,
Stakeholder engagement,
Working in collaboration
|
Full |
|
| 4.16 |
Approaches to stakeholder engagement, including frequency of engagement by type and by stakeholder group |
Defining the content of our reporting,
Integrated impact assessments,
Employee & industrial relations,
Working with our suppliers,
Engaging communities
|
Full |
|
| 4.17 |
Key topics and concerns that have been raised through stakeholder engagement, and how the organisation has responded to those key topics and concerns, including through its reporting |
Defining the content of our reporting,
Stakeholder engagement,
Working in collaboration,
Sustainablility & oil sands,
Case study: The shale revolution
|
Full |
|